The study reveals entanglement may not enhance quantum communication with memory limits, suggesting workspace constraints matter more.
Entanglement is usually treated as a free boost for quantum communication. The question is whether that still holds when memoryistight. Themodelhaseachsidewith S qubitsofworkspaceand E shared ebits. The multi-round Kadison–Schwarz packing lemma is extended to this assisted setting to test if entanglement expands the effective Hilbert–Schmidt budget or not. The outcome lands in two cases. Either \( T√S+α E ≥ Ω(k√n) \) meaning entanglement helps dimensionally but not asymptotically, or \( T√S ≥ Ω(k√n) \) with no E dependence, meaning it does nothing at all. If the second holds, workspace limits are the real bottleneck. Even perfect EPR pairs cannot replace local coherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Aron Cody (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: