Randomised trial shows clinical and cost-effectiveness of a singing intervention for postnatal depression, suggesting a promising alternative to conventional therapies.
Background Postnatal depression (PND) affects up to one in four mothers. However, they may experience barriers to access to conventional treatments, indicating a need for alternatives such as arts-based interventions. A previous trial showed that a 10-week singing intervention could alleviate symptoms of PND. Aims To evaluate, in a larger sample and across a longer timeframe than previously, the clinical effectiveness, implementation effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Melodies for Mums (M4M) singing intervention for symptoms of PND. Method One-hundred and ninety-nine mothers experiencing symptoms of PND (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score ≥10) and their babies were randomised to 10 weeks of in-person singing sessions (M4M, n = 133) or an active control (existing community-based mother–baby activities, n = 66). Mothers were re-assessed at weeks 6, 10, 20 and 36 for depression, healthcare use for themselves and their babies, and health-related quality of life according to the EQ5D-3. The perceived acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure), appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure) and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure) of the activity were also assessed at week 6. Trial registration number: NCT04834622. Results Mothers in both groups experienced attenuation of depressive symptoms by week 10; however, those in the singing group maintained lower EPDS scores than those in the control group at week 20 (10.7 v . 12.2 (mean difference 95% CI [−2.96, −0.22]), P = 0.023) and week 36 (9.85 v . 11.4 [−2.93, −0.19], P = 0.026). Mothers in the singing group were also more likely to remain in the study (77 v . 57%, χ 2 (1) = 12.92, P < 0.001) and found their programme more acceptable (4.75 v. 4.0 [0.25, 0.83], U = 2436.5, P < 0.001), appropriate (4.25 v . 3.88 [0.12, 0.62], U = 2241.5, P < 0.001) and feasible (4.75 v . 4.0 [0.41, 0.91], U = 2568.0, P < 0.001). Finally, M4M was associated with 15 extra days of health and was found to be cost-effective (£126–539 per dyad). Conclusion M4M had a long-lasting effect on symptoms of PND and was perceived to be more suitable than existing activities; thus, M4M represents a worthwhile investment for healthcare systems as an intervention for mothers experiencing symptoms of PND.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bind et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: