Analysis reveals systemic issues and ethical challenges in AI mobile learning, suggesting dire implications for educational outcomes.
This paper critically analyzes the proposition of implementing Artificial Intelligence-Powered Mobile Learning Systems (AI-PMLS) as a solution for enhancing educational outcomes within Nigerian universities, addressing challenges like massification and pedagogical lag. While acknowledging the potential benefits—specifically AI-driven personalization and the ubiquity of student-owned mobile devices—the analysis argues that this technological solution is fundamentally threatened by systemic operational deficits. The critique focuses on three major areas: Infrastructure and Economic Reality (data poverty, network instability, and the energy/battery conundrum leading to technological exclusion), Ethical and Policy Challenges (algorithmic bias, the Black Box problem, and data sovereignty concerns), and Institutional Capacity (faculty skill gaps and the risk of pedagogical deskilling). The paper utilizes visual evidence of personal devices to ground the discussion in current student access realities. It concludes that without mandatory Offline-First Design, the establishment of a Digital Equity Fund to mitigate data costs, and Rigorous Ethical Auditing of algorithms, AI-PMLS will likely exacerbate existing digital and socio-economic disparities, ultimately failing to deliver equitable educational enhancement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adu Emmanuel Ifedayo (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: