This research demonstrates NP-hardness in determining snake-winnable graphs, highlighting properties of bipartite and Hamiltonian structures.
Snake is a classic computer game, which has been around for decades. Based on this game, we study the game of Snake on arbitrary undirected graphs. A snake forms a simple path that has to move to an apple while avoiding colliding with itself. When the snake reaches the apple, it grows longer, and a new apple appears. A graph on which the snake has a strategy to keep eating apples until it covers all the vertices of the graph is called snake-winnable. We prove that determining whether a graph is snake-winnable is NP-hard, even when restricted to grid graphs. We fully characterize snake-winnable graphs for odd-sized bipartite graphs and graphs with vertex-connectivity 1. While Hamiltonian graphs are always snake-winnable, we show that non-Hamiltonian snake-winnable graphs have a girth of at most 6 and that this bound is tight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graafsma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: