PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Physical Review Applied2 citationsOpen Access

Ab initio modeling of quantum dot qubits: Coupling, gate dynamics, and robustness versus charge noise

View Full Paper
HJHamza JnaneSBSimon C. Benjamin

Key Points

  • Predictive modeling enables optimization of quantum dot qubit designs for enhanced performance and robustness.
  • The method identifies exchange coupling and gate dynamics, predicting loss and infidelity rates across voltage profiles.
  • Testing of robust pulse sequences shows an order of magnitude improvement in fidelity by correcting systematic errors.
  • Utilizing both three-dimensional and efficient two-dimensional computations enhances the prediction capabilities of qubit behavior.

Abstract

Electron spins in semiconductor devices are highly promising building blocks for quantum processors (QPs). Commercial semiconductor foundries can create QPs using the same processes used for conventional chips, once the QP design is suitably specified. There is a vast accessible design space; to identify the most promising options for fabrication, one requires predictive modeling of interacting electrons in real geometries and complex nonideal environments. In this work we explore a modeling method based on real-space grids, an approach without assumptions relating to device topology and therefore with wide applicability. Given an electrode geometry, we determine the exchange coupling between quantum dot qubits, and model the full evolution of a SWAP gate to predict qubit loss and infidelity rates for various voltage profiles. We determine full, three-dimensional solutions and introduce a method that can obtain near-identical predictions using far more efficient two-dimensional computations. Moreover we explore the impact of unwanted charge defects (static and dynamic) in the environment, and test robust pulse sequences. As an example we exhibit a sequence correcting both systematic errors and (unknown) charge defects, observing an order of magnitude boost in fidelity. The technique can thus identify the most promising device designs for fabrication, as well as bespoke control sequences for each such device.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jnane et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0ba59c50c73ebef9fa9c2https://doi.org/10.1103/rm43-nh9b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ab initio modelling of quantum dot qubits: Coupling, gate dynamics and robustness versus charge noise2024
  2. 2Electrostatically Interacting Wannier Qubits in Curved Space2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Simulated Charge Stability in a MOSFET Linear Quantum Dot Array2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Exploring Semiconductor Qubits: Simulation of a Four Quantum Dot Silicon Device2025
  5. 5Electronic Correlations in Multielectron Silicon Quantum Dots2024