PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Materials7 citationsOpen Access

Physicochemical Properties of Hematite Nanoparticles Obtained via Thermogravimetric Conversion of Biosynthesized Nanomaghemite

View Full Paper
JRJuan A. Ramos‐GuivarMMMercedes del Pilar Marcos-CarrilloRRRenzo Rueda‐Vellasmin

Key Points

  • Hematite nanoparticles showed distinct magnetic properties and coercivity due to structural changes during conversion.
  • X-ray diffraction confirmed phase-pure hematite with crystallite sizes of 54 and 56 nm for different samples.
  • Mössbauer spectroscopy highlighted multiphase coexistence, emphasizing the impact of biosynthesized precursors on nanoparticle evolution.
  • Transmission electron microscopy indicated a bimodal distribution in one sample, revealing differences in particle size.

Abstract

Hematite nanoparticles (α−Fe2O3 NPs) were synthesized through a thermal conversion of synthetic and biosynthesized nanomaghemite (γ−Fe2O3 NPs) precursors. X-ray diffraction data confirmed phase-pure hematite with crystallite sizes of 54 and 56 nm for the H1 and H2 samples, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed a bimodal-like distribution feature (peaks at 18.5 and 35.5 nm) for the H1 sample, while the histogram plot of the H2 sample displayed a homogeneous particle size distribution with a mean size of 28 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed Fe3+ ions as the dominant oxidation state in both samples. In addition, while 57Mössbauer spectroscopy indicated relaxation effects and line broadening for the H1 sample at both 300 K and 16 K, consistent with incomplete γ→α transformation, the H2 sample exhibited spectra at the same temperatures resembling a bulk-like hematite. Magnetometry supported these findings since the H1 sample showed enhanced coercivity (2.2 kOe) and remanence (0.23 emu/g), features attributed to a residual ferrimagnetic contribution of γ−Fe2O3 NPs, and the H2 sample exhibited weaker ferromagnetism, as typically found in nanoscale hematite. These results highlight the synergistic use of X-ray photoelectron and Mössbauer spectroscopies, and magnetic measurements to reveal subtle multiphase coexistence, demonstrating that precursor chemistry and biosynthetic functionalization decisively govern the structural and magnetic evolution of γ→α−Fe2O3 NPs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramos‐Guivar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0f51d8dd8ea469b1d6e65https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204677
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Iron Oxides2003 · 4,338 citations
  2. 2Optimizing Charge Separation and Transport: Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting in α-Fe2O3/CZTS Nanorod Arrays2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3A review on nanotechnological application of magnetic iron oxides for heavy metal removal2019 · 274 citations
  4. 4Static and dynamic magnetic properties of spherical magnetite nanoparticles2003 · 1,388 citations
  5. 5Thermal properties of nanocrystalline goethite, magnetite, and maghemite2012 · 71 citations