PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 20250 citationsOpen Access

1-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning

View Full Paper
WLWenkai LiLSLiwen SunZGZhenxiang Guan

Key Points

  • Multi-agent reasoning significantly reduces private information leakage by 18% on the ConfAIde benchmark.
  • The framework's iterative validation process improves adherence to contextual privacy norms, enhancing privacy in interactive settings.
  • Systematic ablation studies reveal how privacy errors propagate through information flows in large language models.
  • Experiments demonstrate the superiority of multi-agent configurations over single-agent baselines for privacy preservation.

Abstract

Addressing contextual privacy concerns remains challenging in interactive settings where large language models (LLMs) process information from multiple sources (e. g. , summarizing meetings with private and public information). We introduce a multi-agent framework that decomposes privacy reasoning into specialized subtasks (extraction, classification), reducing the information load on any single agent while enabling iterative validation and more reliable adherence to contextual privacy norms. To understand how privacy errors emerge and propagate, we conduct a systematic ablation over information-flow topologies, revealing when and why upstream detection mistakes cascade into downstream leakage. Experiments on the ConfAIde and PrivacyLens benchmark with several open-source and closed-sourced LLMs demonstrate that our best multi-agent configuration substantially reduces private information leakage (18\% on ConfAIde and 19\% on PrivacyLens with GPT-4o) while preserving the fidelity of public content, outperforming single-agent baselines. These results highlight the promise of principled information-flow design in multi-agent systems for contextual privacy with LLMs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f12bfb2107091eab27a3fbhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.07667
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper