Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS in video quality assessment, revealing LPIPS's superior alignment with human perception.
This paper presents a tool for video quality assessment that allows the selection of quality (QP), temporal (FPS), and spatial (bitrate) scalability parameters. The proposal integrates traditional metrics such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), together with the perceptual metric Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS), which is based on deep neural networks. To validate its effectiveness, a two-phase subjective evaluation methodology was applied. In the first phase, participants assessed videos encoded with the same scalability parameter, showing a strong correspondence between visual perception and objective metrics. In the second phase, different configurations were compared, revealing a preference for high quality and intermediate spatial scalability. Additionally, in experiments with common distortions such as blurring and noise, LPIPS achieved a sensitivity of 73.64%, outperforming PSNR and SSIM in its alignment with human perception. The main contribution of this work is a tool that combines objective and subjective evaluations, enabling a more comprehensive analysis that closely reflects human visual perception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: