Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis investigates the impact of uterine artery embolization on pregnancy rates and conception time in women with fibroids, highlighting significant findings.
Background: Uterine fibroids affect 70–80% of women by age 50, often impairing fertility through mechanical distortion and altered endometrial receptivity. Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive alternative to surgery, though its impact on future fertility remains debated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate pregnancy rates, time to conception, and fertility-related complications following UAE in women with symptomatic fibroids. Methods: A systematic search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other databases (January 2005–March 2025) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting fertility outcomes ≥ 6 months after UAE were included. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rates and time to conception. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (observational studies) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: Thirty-three studies (4287 women) were included; 85.2% had follow-up. The pregnancy rate was 52.1% (95% CI: 46.8–57.4%), with a mean time to conception of 14.7 months. Pregnancy rates were highest in women < 30 years (67.8%) and lowest in those > 40 years (31.5%). Unilateral UAE had superior outcomes to bilateral (61.2% vs. 49.8%). Conclusions: UAE can preserve fertility in ~50% of selected patients, with better outcomes in younger women. Early intervention is advised for fertility preservation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucuri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: