PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Journal of Functional Biomaterials2 citationsOpen Access

Fibronectin- and Bioactive Glass-Modified Alginate Scaffolds Support Limited Primary Cell Proliferation In Vitro yet Demonstrate Effective Host Integration In Vivo

View Full Paper
BGBenedetta GuagniniAMAndrea MazzoleniAMAdrien Moya

Key Points

  • Fibronectin-modified scaffolds improve adhesion and support cell proliferation in immortalized cells.
  • Primary human bone marrow-derived and adipose-derived stem cells show minimal expansion with all scaffold types.
  • In vivo implantation of scaffolds led to significant host tissue integration and extracellular matrix formation.
  • Limited vascularization indicates fundamental challenges remain despite strong biocompatibility observed with scaffolds.

Abstract

Alginate-hydroxyapatite (AL) scaffolds modified with fibronectin (FN) or bioactive glass (BGMS10) have recently been characterized for their physicochemical properties and proposed as promising candidates for bone regeneration. Here, we present their first systematic biological evaluation, focusing on adhesion, proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and in vivo host response. We compared FN-, BG-, and unmodified AL scaffolds using an immortalized mesenchymal stromal cell line (M-SOD) and primary human bone marrow-derived (BM-MSCs) and adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs). FN scaffolds enhanced initial adhesion across all cell types and supported proliferation in M-SODs, but primary BM-MSCs and ASCs showed minimal expansion, regardless of scaffold type. BG scaffolds promoted expression of late-stage osteogenic markers in BM-MSCs, consistent with their ion release profile, but had limited impact on ASCs. In vivo subcutaneous implantation of acellular scaffolds in nude mice revealed robust host cell infiltration and extracellular matrix deposition across all scaffold types, confirming biocompatibility and integration. However, vascularization remained limited and did not differ substantially between formulations. Together, these findings highlight a critical discrepancy between immortalized and primary stromal cell responses to scaffold cues, underscoring the choice of cell source when evaluating the biocompatibility of a novel scaffold. At the same time, the effective in vivo integration observed across scaffold types emphasizes the importance of host tissue responses for translational evaluation of functional biomaterials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guagnini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f17f111f11f0e857c534ebhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16100386
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper