This analysis uses collision cross sections to study cationized imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos, indicating structural implications.
The gas-phase cross-platform collision cross sections (CCS) of cationized (protonated, sodiated, and potassiated) imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos were analyzed with single- and multi-field drift tube, traveling wave, trapped ion, and cyclic ion mobility mass spectrometry. The experimental cross-platform CCS are in the range of: [imidacloprid+H]+ = 154−158 Å; [imidacloprid+Na]+ = 158–160 Ų; [imidacloprid+K]+ = 160−165 Ų; [chlorpyrifos+H]+ = 163−166 Ų; [chlorpyrifos+Na]+ = 170−173 Ų, and [chlorpyrifos+K]+ = 175–176 Ų, and are within ~3% of each other and inter-laboratory values. DFT predicts imidacloprid coordinates cations at the pyridinic N, with a degree of nitroguanidine interaction that depends on the cation, while chlorpyrifos also coordinates cations at the N, but consistently forms 6-membered ring structures. The theoretically predicted CCS of protonated imidacloprid deviated significantly (7−10%) from the experimental CCS. In contrast, sodiated and potassiated imidacloprid ions’ theoretically predicted CCS were consistent (2−3%) with the experimental CCS, supporting a more compact 9-membered ring-shaped structure compared to the protonated congener. On the other hand, predicted CCS for protonated chlorpyrifos matched the experimental CCS well (2−5%), but sodiated and potassiated chlorpyrifos had less agreement between calculated and experimental CCS (>5.5%), however structural trends are reproduced. While cross-platform variations are minimal, discrepancies in predicted CCS highlight the need for standardized protocols before CCS can reliably identify pesticide residues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rusli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: