Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis highlights shifts in ground-layer vegetation in national forests, indicating earthworm impacts and dieback relationships.
Northern hardwood forests of the Lake Superior region face a series of novel disturbance pressures including canopy dieback. Previous studies have linked regional sugar-maple (Acer saccharum) canopy dieback to introduced earthworms, which may have coinciding impacts on the ground-layer plant community. Dieback–earthworm interactions may lead to important longer-term changes in forest structure and function, but these relationships but have not been characterized. We sampled ground-layer plant communities in five national forest units in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota in 2010, and again just over a decade later in 2021. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination and indicator species analysis were used to assess relationships among ground-layer community composition and structure, functional traits, and environmental gradients including forest-floor condition and A. saccharum canopy dieback. Increases in dieback and earthworm disturbance in the decade between inventories were accompanied by a marked divergence in observed ground-layer plant community structure between national forests. Ordinations of 2021 data indicated a strengthening relationship between forest-floor condition and earthworm abundance. Our results suggest that earthworm impacts and A. saccharum dieback are driving changes in the ground layer on broad geographic and temporal scales, with short- and long-term implications for plant-community structure and function, and higher trophic levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: