Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study highlights increased adenoma and SSL detection rates with family history in Japan.
BACKGROUND According to the guidelines in the United States, individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer should be screened at the age of 40 years. Data on the prevalence of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) in individuals aged 40-49 years in Japan are lacking. AIM To investigate the effect of family history on the detection of adenomas and SSLs during colonoscopy in Japan. METHODS This retrospective, single-center cohort study included individuals aged 40-79 years who underwent colonoscopy by expert endoscopists with an adenoma detection rate (ADR) ≥ 40% between 2021 and 2024. The ADR and adenoma plus SSL detection rate (ASDR) were investigated according to age. Multivariable analyses were performed to examine the effects of first-degree family history of colorectal cancer, fecal immunochemical test, and sex on the ADR and ASDR for each age group. A binomial logistic regression model was used. RESULTS In 10248 participants, the overall ADR and ASDR were 53.6% and 59.1%, respectively. The ADR and ASDR increased with age. Among 2317 participants aged 40-49 years, the presence of a family history significantly increased the ADR (47.6% vs 38.2%). The odds ratio of a family history for the ADR adjusted by sex and fecal immunochemical test was 1.59 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-2.25). In contrast, there was no significant association between the ADR and family history in participants aged 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years. Similarly, a family history significantly increased the ASDR (58.0% vs 43.7%) in participants aged 40-49 years. The odds ratio of a family history for the ASDR was 1.92 (95% confidence interval: 1.36-2.71). CONCLUSION Participants with a family history exhibited significantly elevated ADR (47.6%) and ASDR (58.0%), in their 40s. Individuals with a family history should initiate colonoscopy at 40 years old.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toyoshima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: