This analysis reveals complex behavior of entropy and energy in self-gravitating turbulent systems, suggesting unstable states.
In this paper we continue the study of the thermodynamics of fluid elements in isothermal turbulent self-gravitating systems, presented by molecular clouds. We build the model again based on the hypothesis that can, locally, substitute the turbulent kinetic energy per fluid element for the macrotemperature of a gas of fluid elements. Also, we presume that the cloud has a fractal nature. The virial theorem is applicable to our system, too (hence it is in a dynamical equilibrium). But in contrast to the previous work, where the turbulent kinetic energy clearly dominates over the gravity, in the present paper, we assume that the virial relation 2Ekin + Egrav = 0 holds, for the entire cloud. Hence the cloud is dense and strongly self-gravitating object. On that base we calculate the internal and the total energy per fluid element. Writing down the first principle we obtain the explicit form of the entropy increment. It demonstrates an untypical behaviour. In the range 0 ≤ β < 0.4, for the turbulent scaling exponent, the entropy increment is positive, but in the interval 0.4 < β ≤ 1 is negative, and for βcr = 0.4 is zero. The latter two regimes (negative and zero) can not be explained from the classical point of view. Although, we give some arguments for the reasons of these irregularities and the main is that our cloud is an open self-organizing system, driving by the gravity. Moreover, we study the system for critical points under the conditions of three thermodynamic ensembles: micro-canonical, canonical, and grand canonical. Only the canonical ensemble demonstrates a critical point, which is a maximum of the free energy and corresponds to an unstable equilibrium of the system. Analysis of the equilibrium potentials, also, shows that the system resides in unstable states under all the conditions. These results we explain arising the hypothesis that the virialized cloud is in the final unstable state before its contraction and subsequent fragmentation or collapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donkov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: