Analysis shows tax base fragmentation influences fiscal stress in local governments, suggesting inequality issues.
The United States devolves responsibility for providing critical services to local governments. With limited centralized transfers, the ability to provide these services is determined by the base of taxable wealth that is contained within contested municipal boundaries. We document how jurisdictional fragmentation and economic segregation interact to create tax base fragmentation, the unequal allocation of taxable property wealth across jurisdictional boundaries. The level of tax base fragmentation varies across the country, but is substantial in many large metros, and is associated with both the amount and type of revenue raised by local governments. We also identify hundreds of individual jurisdictions that disproportionately benefit from or are harmed by tax base fragmentation, showing how the institutional structure of US fiscal federalism allows some jurisdictions to function as tax shelters for wealthy residents and corporations, while conversely subjecting other jurisdictions to severe fiscal stress, even in broadly prosperous metropolitan areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manduca et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: