This tutorial introduces the tug-of-war model for the implicit association test, highlighting its advantages and parameter estimation in a large data set.
In this tutorial, we describe a newly developed model of Implicit Association Test (IAT) data—the Tug-of-war model—which introduces a theoretically meaningful association parameter and mathematically specified mechanism through which the parameter explains the IAT data. We outline the model’s benefits over existing alternatives, estimate its parameters for a large data set (N > 10,000), and describe inferences that can be drawn from it. Additionally, we provide an in-depth description of the model structure, its parameters, and a step-by-step guide to fit the model to IAT data. To minimize any technical learning curve, we provide detailed guidelines for all required computational tools (e.g., JAGS) needed to implement our model. We hope this tutorial makes it easier to use our model for IAT data and to further enable social cognition researchers to explain behavior using mathematical models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alaukik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: