Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review highlights tensions in global integration and local responsiveness in HRM, suggesting future areas for research.
Driven by globalization and digital transformation, international and comparative Human Resource Management (HRM) has become a critical field for understanding organizational adaptability and competitive advantage. This study systematically reviews 86 key articles to map the current research landscape, identify theoretical gaps, and propose a forward-looking research agenda. The review identifies three core themes shaping the field: (1) the central tension between global integration and local responsiveness, a complex interplay driven by deep-seated cultural and institutional differences across nations; (2) the strategic imperative to align international HRM (IHRM) with organizational performance, a nuanced relationship increasingly analyzed with sophisticated configurational methodologies; and (3) the transformative impact of contemporary frontiers, notably digitalization, artificial intelligence, and the growing demand for sustainability. However, the literature also reveals key limitations: the integration of macro- and micro-level theories remains underdeveloped, research requires broader methods and deeper exploration of emerging topics like digital ethics and Green HRM, and the localization practices in developing economies are significantly under-researched. We thus propose that future research should focus on deepening multi-level contextual analysis, fostering interdisciplinary innovation, and addressing the challenges posed by technological ethics, sustainability, and diverse geopolitical contexts. This will help build a theoretical framework with greater explanatory power and practical relevance for a complex world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Run Yang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: