Retrospective cohort study identifies UIV+1 slope's role in shear force and PJK risk, suggesting alignment adjustments preoperatively.
Study design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives Despite several recognized risk factors, PJK remains a common postoperative occurrence in adult spinal deformity surgery. This study aims to identify a significant preoperative sagittal alignment parameter that is associated with vertebral loading at the proximal junction and can predict the likelihood of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients who underwent fusion surgery from lower thoracic (T9-T11) to the pelvis were included in this retrospective study. Based on the preoperative slope of the level above the upper-instrumented vertebrae (UIV+1), patients were stratified into two groups: posterior and anterior UIV+1 slope. Patient-specific musculoskeletal (MSK) models were created from pre and immediate postoperative EOS images. Pre and postoperative radiographic parameters, and normalized vertebral loading at UIV and UIV+1 were compared. Results 6/21 (28.6%) patients with posterior UIV+1 slope developed PJK, while the incidence of PJK for anterior UIV+1 slope was 24/34 (70.6%). Average normalized shear difference of UIV+1 in PJK and non-PJK patients was 0.19 and 0.1 for posterior slope patients, whereas for anterior slope patients, they were 0.3 and 0.18 respectively. Statistically significant associations were revealed between UIV+1 slope, shear force and risk of PJK development. Conclusion Utilizing mathematical and musculoskeletal analyses with clinical correlation, we were able to demonstrate UIV+1 slope as a local sagittal alignment risk factor that affects shear force at UIV/UIV+1, influencing PJK risk. Considering UIV+1 slope as a local alignment risk factor for PJK development may provide insight regarding UIV selection and alignment goals during preoperative planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alavi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: