Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This approach integrates local surrogates with evolutionary search, generating high-quality solutions despite computational challenges.
This research This study presents the Linear Ensemble Algorithm (LEAL), which couples evolutionary search with local, linear regression–based surrogates and a neighbor-guided linear combination scheme for constrained engineering problems and standard benchmarks. For single-objective problems, LEAL frequently attains or closely approaches global optima on multimodal functions such as Rastrigin and Griewank, yielding ~55–85% lower mean error than GA, DE, and PSO, and it can occasionally uncover best-known minima in engineering tasks (e.g., Pressure Vessel), indicating an ability to exploit intricate design trade-offs. For multi-objective problems, LEAL generates feasible Pareto fronts but generally trails NSGA-II in convergence and efficiency, exhibiting higher GD⁺, longer runtimes, and greater memory usage (often by one to two orders of magnitude). These outcomes reflect the computational overhead of maintaining local surrogate ensembles: while LEAL can produce high-quality solutions, its average performance, runtime, and memory footprint are often inferior to lightweight baselines. Comparisons with CMA-ES, Bayesian Optimization, and SSA-NSGA-II confirm the same trade-offs. Overall, LEAL is a robust yet computationally intensive option best suited when ultimate solution quality outweighs runtime; future work will focus on improving efficiency, streamlining ensemble components, and extending applicability to large-scale and dynamic problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wongsrisai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: