Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-method analysis reveals carrying capacity as a key issue for water and sanitation in Uttarakhand, indicating urgent need for sustainable planning.
Abstract In March 2021, the National Green Tribunal of India (NGT), directed states to assess the carrying capacities of Indian hill cities to balance tourism and ecological sustainability. This ground-breaking mandate was the first stepping stone to restrict unplanned development and regulate the population that can be sustained by the cities in the Indian Himalayan Region. Nainital, a major tourist destination in Uttarakhand, faces immense pressure on its urban infrastructure and service delivery, especially in the context of water and sanitation, due to the rising tourist influx. However, India lacks a national-level framework for assessing and managing the carrying capacity of the urban environment. This study, conducted by National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), develops a comprehensive framework for assessing carrying capacity by using key indicators, correction factor-based calculations, and temporal analysis. A mixed-method approach, including a systematic literature review, key informant interviews (KIIs), and focus group discussions (FGDs), was employed. As per the URDPFI Guidelines, while the city could theoretically accommodate up to 149,230 visitors per day based on real carrying capacity, the effective carrying capacity is limited to approximately 8,422 visitors daily due to resource and service delivery constraints. The research offers policymakers a data-driven model for sustainable water and sanitation management, aiding urban planning in ecologically sensitive areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajaj et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: