Qualitative study shows educators' preferences for clear communication in mental health strategies, highlighting the need for pedagogical approaches.
BACKGROUND Schools play a critical role in identifying adolescent mental health needs early, yet the effectiveness of school-based strategies often depends on how well health information is communicated to educators. OBJECTIVE This study explores how pedagogical leaders perceive a proposed model for adolescent mental health check-ups and identifies key factors for designing effective communication tools between healthcare professionals and schools. METHODS Two participatory workshops were conducted with 44 pedagogical coordinators and educational counselors from elite private schools in São Paulo, Brazil. Structured group discussions and collaborative design activities were used to elicit responses to proposed mental health report formats. Data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach supported by manual coding and cross-checking by two independent reviewers. No software was used; inter-rater reliability was achieved through iterative discussion. RESULTS Participants expressed a strong preference for mental health reports that are clear, context-sensitive, and co-developed with educators. Key themes included the need for pedagogical rather than clinical language, the importance of mediation by coordinators, and the value of aggregate data for family engagement and institutional planning. Co-creation of communication tools was reported to enhance educators’ sense of relevance and confidence in discussing mental health. These preferences were consistently reported across participants regardless of years of experience, suggesting shared epistemic needs across the field. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights the value of user-informed communication models in mental health screening. Co-created tools aligned with pedagogical practices are more likely to be used and trusted. Effective communication design should be prioritized alongside the development of screening instruments themselves. Further research is needed to adapt this approach to low-resource public school contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinzato et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: