This comparative analysis reveals critical buckling load differences in power-law and sigmoid-law shells, indicating material gradation effects.
Purpose This study aims to investigate the linear buckling behavior of functionally graded cylindrical shells under axial compression or lateral pressure. The shells are composed of functionally graded materials (FGMs), with through-the-thickness property variation defined by power-law (P-FGM) or a sigmoid-law (S-FGM) distribution. Design/methodology/approach The governing equilibrium and stability equations for the buckling analysis are derived based on classical shell theory. To determine a critical buckling load, an approximated solution is assumed which satisfies the boundary conditions as well as the governing equations. The finite element analysis in ANSYS is also used to determine the critical buckling load. Findings The findings indicate that P-FGM shells have a critical buckling load approximately 40% higher than S-FGM shells. The reason for the increment is that P-FGM shells have a higher effective stiffness, especially in bending, due to the material distribution profile. The analytical approach proved to be efficient, offering reduced computational effort compared to complex finite element models. Research limitations/implications The material is considered to be linear elastic, and the structures are free of imperfections. Originality/value The research focuses on examining the influence of material gradation using P-FGM and S-FGM model. It compares the critical buckling load of shells subjected to axial compression or lateral pressure. Overall, the results highlight the significant influence of material gradation on buckling behavior and provide insights for optimizing FGM shell configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choudhary et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: