Cross-sectional study shows a nonlinear association between TyG-BMI and MAFLD outcomes, suggesting significant implications for healthcare.
Background The relationship between the triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI) and the incidence of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a trending research area. This association is highly important in the realms of healthcare and public health. Objective To explore the impact of TyG-BMI on MAFLD and its contribution to the evolution of diverse phenotypes of fatty liver. Methods In this cross-sectional study, curve fitting was used to assess the relationships between TyG-BMI and MAFLD as well as different MAFLD phenotypes, and multivariate ordinal logistic regression methods were employed to explore the stability of these relationships. Results Curve fitting revealed a nonlinear relationship between TyG-BMI and MAFLD, with a critical threshold of approximately 176.78. Similar relationships were observed between TyG-BMI and different fatty liver phenotypes. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the TyG-BMI was independently associated with different fatty liver phenotypes (nonfibrotic MAFLD odds ratio (OR) = 11.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.38–15.21, p < 0.001; fibrotic MAFLD OR = 37.24, 95% CI = 25.92–53.51, P < 0.001). Even after full variable adjustment, this relationship remained stable (nonfibrotic MAFLD OR = 5.99, 95% CI = 3.25--11.06, P < 0.001; fibrotic MAFLD OR = 5.24, 95% CI = 2.28--12.06, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between TyG-BMI and CAP (correlation coefficient, 0.60) and a weak positive correlation with SWE (correlation coefficient, 0.29). Conclusions The TyG-BMI manifests a nonlinear relationship with the risk of developing distinct MAFLD phenotypes, suggesting its utility as a pivotal metric in the formulation of screening and preventive strategies for MAFLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: