Cross-sectional study shows bilateral fitting improves speech recognition and sound localization in patients, highlighting auditory benefits.
Bilateral fitting of bone-anchored hearing devices (BAHD) remains a contentious topic, as the use of a single device can direct sound to both cochleae. However, the interplay of interaural attenuation and time delay may result in different responses in each ear; thus, greater challenges for unilateral BAHD users. To assess the auditory performance of BAHD users with unilateral and bilateral fitting regarding speech recognition in silence and noise and sound localization. Cross-sectional study. Unilateral BAHD users treated at a Brazilian public hospital underwent a speech recognition test, containing a list of monosyllables at 65dBSPL in silence and noise (S/N ratio = 0dB). The sound localization test employed eight speakers arranged at 45° distance. A recorded trisyllabic word served as the stimulus. For bilateral fitting, an elastic band with a device similar to the implant was used; patients underwent the same tests under identical conditions. Sixteen patients were assessed (mean age = 24.2 years). The average monosyllable recognition in silence rate was 71.5% in unilateral fitting and 78.2% in bilateral fitting. In noise, 61% in unilateral fitting and 72.2% in bilateral fitting. The mean angular deviation for the sound localization test was 80.48° in unilateral fitting and 68.08° in bilateral fitting. The bilateral fitting outcomes were better for all tests. Users with bilateral BAHD fitting had better outcomes for speech recognition and sound localization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: