PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 18, 2025JAMA Oncology21 citations

Active Monitoring, Surgery, and Radiotherapy for Cribriform-Positive and Cribriform-Negative Prostate Cancer

View Full Paper
NSNikita SushentsevAWAnne Y. WarrenRCRichard Colling

Key Points

  • Cribriform-positive disease significantly increased metastasis risk with a hazard ratio of 3.61.
  • Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant ADT decreased 15-year metastasis risk to 8% in cribriform-positive patients.
  • Surgery delayed metastasis but showed no significant long-term benefits compared to active monitoring.
  • Patients with cribriform-negative disease exhibited low metastasis rates, supporting active surveillance.

Abstract

Importance Cribriform prostate cancer is associated with poor outcomes; however, its optimal treatment strategy remains unclear in the absence of randomized data. Objective To retrospectively analyze the results of the PROTECT randomized clinical trial to establish the association between cribriform-positive and cribriform-negative prostate cancer and 15-year risk of metastasis in patients who underwent active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants Between 1999 and 2009, the PROTECT phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled 1643 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to receive active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this secondary analysis of the PROTECT trial, a centralized histopathologic review was conducted on available diagnostic biopsy slides to classify patients as cribriform-positive if they had invasive cribriform carcinoma and/or intraductal carcinoma. Data were collected from January 25, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and were analyzed from October 14, 2024, to January 30, 2025. Exposures Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and cribriform status. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was progression to metastatic disease (bony, visceral, or lymph node metastases on imaging or PSA gt;100 ng/mL). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for randomization variables, were incorporated to assess 15-year metastasis risk. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using the Gray test. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results Among 712 men (mean SD age, 62.0 5.0 years) whose biopsies were retrospectively reviewed, 93 (13.1%) had cribriform-positive disease and 42 (5.9%) developed metastasis. In the intention-to-treat cohort, cribriform-positive disease significantly increased the risk of metastasis (hazard ratio HR, 3.61 95% CI, 1.60-8.11; P = .003). Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant ADT significantly reduced metastasis risk (HR, 0.35 95% CI, 0.16-0.78; P = .04) (15-year cumulative incidence in patients with cribriform-positive disease, 8%), while surgery delayed metastasis but did not significantly improve long-term outcomes compared with active monitoring (HR, 0.52 95% CI, 0.25-1.08; P = .09) (15-year cumulative incidence in patients with cribriform-positive disease, 26% for surgery and 25% for active monitoring). Among patients with cribriform-negative disease, incidence of metastasis was low and did not differ by treatment. Similar per-protocol results were noted. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this secondary analysis of the PROTECT randomized clinical trial suggest that cribriform morphology was a strong, independent predictor of 15-year metastasis among patients with prostate cancer and that radiotherapy with neoadjuvant ADT was associated with a reduced long-term risk of metastasis. Conversely, outcomes were favorable for most patients with cribriform-negative disease, supporting their eligibility for active surveillance. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02044172

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sushentsev et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f396388da44caaba02c87fhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.4125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper