Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A dataset of polarimetric images shows improved detection of colorectal cancer using CNN and EfficientNetV2.
Background In recent years, polarimetric imaging has been developed for various biological applications, including tissue morphological characterization and cancer stage detection. However, to facilitate classification models based on the characteristics of polarization states, it is essential to develop a consistent and standardized dataset of polarimetric images. Findings This study presents a dataset of colorectal cancer polarimetric images designated as ColoPola, which is intended to facilitate research efforts in the field. The dataset consists of 572 sample slices (288 healthy and 284 malignant). For each slice, 36 polarimetric images corresponding to different polarization states are provided. Thus, ColoPola contains 20,592 polarimetric images, of which 10,368 correspond to healthy samples and 10,224 to malignant samples. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the dataset is the first of its kind for colorectal cancer images. The practical utility of the dataset is evaluated using 5 models: 3 models constructed from scratch (CNN, CNN_2, and EfficientFormerV2) and 2 pretrained models (DenseNet and EfficientNetV2). For each model, the input has a size of 224 × 224 × 36, corresponding to the width, height, and red channel value of the polarimetric images, respectively. Conclusions The results show that the CNN, CNN_2, EfficientFormerV2, DenseNet, and EfficientNetV2 models obtain F1 scores of 0.870, 0.862, 0.908, 0.903, and 0.965, respectively, on the testing set. Among the 5 models, EfficientNetV2 achieves the best performance, with all the performance metrics exceeding 0.95 for both the validation set and the testing set. Overall, the results suggest that ColoPola has significant potential as a polarimetric optical imaging-based diagnostic tool for colorectal cancer in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: