PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 18, 2025Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology2 citationsOpen Access

Association of intraocular lens tilt and decentration with visual acuity using SS-OCT-based analysis

View Full Paper
JWJoukje C. WantenNBNoël J.C. BauerABA. Boonstra

Key Points

  • No significant association found between IOL tilt or decentration and corrected distance visual acuity.
  • The maximum IOL tilt measured was 9.54° along the corneal topographic axis, with decentration up to 2.22 mm.
  • Analysis utilized SS-OCT scans to assess tilt and decentration, with data gathered from 168 eyes post-cataract surgery.
  • The findings indicate that assessment methods may vary significantly, highlighting limitations in sample size and results.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the association of postoperative IOL tilt and decentration and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) by performing analyses using IOLMaster700 data and custom-developed software. Setting University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Methods This case series included patients after cataract surgery who underwent SS-OCT scans using the IOLMaster700 with custom-developed software for tilt and decentration analyses. The outcomes based on our custom-developed software were conducted along the pupillary axis (PA) and corneal topographic axis (CTA). Associations between tilt, decentration and CDVA were evaluated. Results A total of 168 eyes (168 patients) were analyzed. The maximum observed IOL tilt was 9.54° along the CTA and 3.69° along the PA. Maximum decentration reached 2.22 mm (CTA) and 2.17 mm (PA). Mean tilt was 1.21 ± 0.69° (PA) and 4.87 ± 1.52° (CTA), while mean decentration was 0.27 ± 0.25 mm (PA) and 0.27 ± 0.26 mm (CTA). Regression analyses showed no statistically significant associations between tilt or decentration and CDVA, irrespective of the reference axis used. For tilt along the PA, the regression coefficient (B) was 0.004 (95%CI -0.011, 0.020; P = 0.592), for tilt along the CTA, B was − 0.006 (95%CI -0.013, 0.001; P = 0.082). For decentration, B was 0.012 (95%CI -0.020, 0.044; P = 0.455) and 0.002 (SE = 0.018, 95%CI -0.034, 0.037; P = 0.925) along the PA and CTA, respectively. Conclusion In this cohort, IOL tilt and decentration were generally small, with no detectable association with CDVA. The findings emphasize that different assessment methods should not be used interchangeably, and potential effects cannot be excluded given the limited sample and range of values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wanten et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f3eb011cfc5ad53f2907e6https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06965-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Subject-Fixated Coaxially Sighted Corneal Light Reflex: A Clinical Marker for Centration of Refractive Treatments and Devices2014 · 160 citations
  2. 2Influence of intraocular lens tilt and decentration on wavefront aberrations2004 · 164 citations
  3. 3Investigation of the isoplanatic patch and wavefront aberration along the pupillary axis compared to the line of sight in the eye2012 · 34 citations
  4. 4Monte-Carlo simulation for calculating phakic supplementary lenses based on a thick and thin lens model using anterior segment OCT data2023 · 3 citations
  5. 5Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Crystalline Lens Tilt and Decentration Relative to the Corneal Vertex2021 · 11 citations