PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 18, 2025Processes2 citationsOpen Access

Research on Stuck Pipe Prediction Based on Supervised and Unsupervised Ensemble Learning

View Full Paper
BXBo XiaYWYiwei WangQLQihao Li

Key Points

  • The ensemble model achieved a prediction accuracy of 90.1%, significantly enhancing drilling safety and efficiency.
  • Integrating mechanism constraints with multiple models improved accuracy by an average of 10% over single models.
  • Models used include Autoencoder, BiLSTM, and Transformer, each extracting features from time-series data.
  • The false alarm rate was reduced to 7.7%, suggesting superior risk mitigation throughout drilling operations.

Abstract

Stuck pipe is a common and serious accident in oil drilling processes, which may lead to huge economic losses and safety risks. In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology has provided new ideas for stuck pipe prediction. Existing intelligent prediction studies on stuck pipe mostly focus on the optimization and application of a single unsupervised or supervised algorithm, or the research on simple ensemble learning of these two types of algorithms. This paper proposes a stuck pipe prediction method based on mechanism constraints and a deep learning ensemble model. By integrating the advantages of mechanism constraints and various time-series data processing models, this method achieves accurate prediction of stuck pipe. The method first performs preprocessing, feature engineering, and mechanism constraints on multi-parameter time-series data during drilling, then constructs three models, namely, Autoencoder, BiLSTM, and Transformer, for feature extraction and preliminary prediction, respectively. Finally, it integrates the prediction results of multiple models through a meta-model to improve prediction accuracy. The experimental results show that after introducing mechanism constraints, the accuracy of each model increases by an average of 10%. For the stuck pipe prediction task, the accuracy and precision of the proposed ensemble model reach 90.1% and 95.9%, respectively. Compared with single models, the ensemble model achieves an optimal balance between the false alarm rate and missing alarm rate, which are 7.7% and 11.0%, respectively. Its comprehensive performance is significantly better than that of single models, which can provide effective risk early warning for drilling operations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xia et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f3eb011cfc5ad53f290914https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103309
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stuck pipe incident prediction integrating an enhanced attention mechanism2026
  2. 2Real-Time Detection of Stuck Pipe Utilizing Hybrid AI-Physical Prediction Models2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Detection of stuck pipe problems during drilling tripping operations using artificial intelligence approach2026
  4. 4Mechanism-Integrated Predictive Analytics for Stuck Pipe Prevention: A Physics-Guided Machine Learning Framework with Operational Decision Support2023
  5. 5Mechanism-Integrated Predictive Analytics for Stuck Pipe Prevention: A Physics-Guided Machine Learning Framework with Operational Decision Support2023