Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study compares critical thermal and salinity maxima of Valencia robertae and Gambusia holbrooki, highlighting the threat of invasive species.
Invasive fish species are a major driver of freshwater native fish biodiversity loss and their spread and impacts on the native fish are expected to increase within the current freshwater salinization and global warming crisis. In the current study, the upper thermal and salinity tolerance of the geographically range-restricted, threatened killifish Valencia robertae and its alien competitor, the globally invasive Eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki are compared in an experimental setting. Fish were exposed, after acclimation, to a continuous, dynamic temperature or salinity increase until predefined sub-lethal end points (loss of equilibrium and/or loss of buoyancy). The critical thermal and salinity maxima (CTMax and CSMax) were then calculated as the arithmetic mean of the combined thermal or salinity points at which the endpoint was attained. Finally, thermal and salinity safety margins for the two species were also calculated using abiotic data. Mosquitofish (females and males pooled) showed an average CΤmax of 35.85 °C and the killifish 36.27 °C (sexes pooled). Mosquitofish (male) showed an average CSmax of 40.25‰ and (male) killifish 42.64‰ (sexes also pooled). Killifish safety margins are much higher than those of the mosquitofish. Future impacts of global warming and salinisation on these species and on their interactions under current climate change scenarios are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapakos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: