Survey analysis reveals AI literacy influences attitudes and trust in technology adoption among students, suggesting educational enhancements.
This study examines Chinese university students’ adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools by integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and AI literacy dimensions into a hybrid framework. Survey data from 1006 students across various majors and regions are analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Notably, AI literacy (i.e., students’ AI ethics, evaluation, and awareness) positively affect their attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, although the influence patterns vary according to the literacy dimension. Perceived privacy risks reduce AI trust, which mediates adoption behavior. Overall, core TPB pathways are validated, with behavioral intentions significantly predicting students’ actual use. Gender and regional differences moderate the key relationships. The results of this study suggest that enhancing students’ ethical and evaluative competencies, building user trust, and addressing privacy concerns could promote generative AI integration in education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: