Observational analysis reveals that health insurance increases out-of-pocket health expenditure among B40 households, suggesting a need for national health insurance.
Introduction: Health insurance plays a crucial role in healthcare and financial protection. Nonetheless, a considerable portion of Malaysia's low-income population lacks health insurance. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between health insurance and out-of-pocket health expenditure (OOPHE) among the low-income group (B40 households) in Malaysia. Materials and methods: The current study used data from the National Health and Morbidity Surveys (NHMS) conducted in 2015 and consisted of 18,616 B40 respondents. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and a two-part model were employed for data analysis purposes. The two-part model encompassed a logit regression in the first part and a generalised linear model (GLM) in the second. Results: Most B40 households are underinsured, with only 13.81% having insurance. The results also found that insured households (0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01%, 0.0.87%), those over 65 years old (1.00, 95% CI: 0.41%, 1.60%), utilisation of inpatient care (2.62, 95% CI: 2.24%, 2.99%), women (0.28, 95% CI: 0.20%, 0.35%), higher education (0.27, 95% CI: 0.13%, 0.42%) and retirees (1.18, 95% CI: -0.01%, 2.37%) significantly spent more on OOPHE. In comparison, private workers (-0.32, 95% CI: -0.50%, -0.14%) and self-employed individuals (-0.27, 95% CI: -0.46%, -0.08%) significantly spent less on OOPHE. Conclusion: The findings confirm that health insurance significantly increases the OOPHE among B40 households. This highlights the necessity of a national health insurance (NHI) program that is managed by the government and provides a comprehensive benefits package. NHI will achieve much better results in controlling healthcare expenditures and reducing the prevalence of catastrophic OOPHE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isamail et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: