PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 18, 2025Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences0 citations

The Fault Lines of Modernity: A Mixed-Methods Autopsy of State Power, Social Resistance, and Identity Dialectics in Indonesia's New Capital Project

View Full Paper
ASAinur SerikovaShakarim State University Of SemeyHCH. B. J. CliffordMFMuhammad FaizUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia

Key Points

  • The IKN project's state-led development is generating profound anxieties and social fissures among communities, highlighting the struggles for identity.
  • Quantitative analysis showed indigenous populations have significantly higher resistance participation and anxiety levels, with critical predictors identified.
  • Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study combined survey data from 500 households with qualitative insights from 50 in-depth interviews.
  • The findings underscore the necessity for rights-based development, as the current model risks engendering exclusionary modernity and increasing resistance.

Abstract

The state-led relocation of Indonesia's capital to Nusantara (IKN) is a monumental project framed as a leap into a sustainable future. However, this top-down imposition of modernity is creating deep social fissures on the ground. This study conducts a sociological autopsy of the IKN development, dissecting the intricate mechanisms of resistance, displacement, and identity formation among affected communities. We employed a concurrent embedded mixed-methods design in North Penajam Paser, East Kalimantan (Jan 2024–Mar 2025). A structured survey was administered to 500 households, selected via a multi-stage sampling process, to quantify displacement anxieties and resistance participation. This was triangulated with 50 in-depth interviews with community leaders, displaced residents, and officials. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests and a Negative Binomial regression model to identify predictors of resistance, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Survey data revealed profound anxiety, with indigenous communities reporting significantly higher distress levels (t(498) = 10.2, p < 0.001). The Negative Binomial regression identified indigenous status (IRR=3.45, p<0.001), reliance on agro-forestry (IRR=2.88, p<0.001), and higher anxiety scores (IRR=1.12, p<0.001) as significant predictors of increased participation in resistance activities. Qualitative findings uncovered a sophisticated "tripartite arsenal" of resistance (symbolic, material, legal) and documented the emergence of a "Janus-faced" state, perceived as both coercively present and procedurally absent. In conclusion, the IKN project is a site of intense social struggle where competing modernities collide. State-led development, without genuine participation, engenders resilient and adaptive forms of social resistance and catalyzes a dialectical process of identity politicization. We argue that IKN risks becoming a landscape of exclusionary modernity unless a fundamental shift towards rights-based development is enacted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Serikova et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f408995de60f8893c6fd2fhttps://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v8i4.295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper