Noninferiority assessment finds biosimilar infliximab matches originator in effectiveness, suggesting cost-effective options for IBD treatment.
Goals: Definitively prove noninferiority of biosimilar infliximab to originator. Background: The advent of biosimilar agents has made biological medications for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) more affordable and widely available. We conducted a noninferiority assessment of the effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar agent CT-P13 versus the original for treatment of IBD in a nationwide analysis. Study: We used the Epidemiology Group of the Israeli Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Nucleus Cohort (epi-IIRN), including data on patients with IBD from all Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO) and conducted a noninferiority analysis of infliximab originator and biosimilar CT-P13 based on time from induction of treatment until failure. Treatment failure was defined as steroid dependency, need for IBD-related surgery, or treatment change to an alternative biological. The groups were matched using a propensity score of 0.15 caliper based on sex, ethnicity, district, socio-economic status, age at diagnosis, disease activity, time until biological treatment, prior biological treatments, surgeries, and hospitalizations. Results: We compared 564 patients treated with infliximab originator matched to 564 treated with CT-P13. The results proved noninferiority in all parameters, with a margin of d=10% or smaller over 5 years ( P <0.05). In time to failure, noninferiority was demonstrated with a d=1% ( P =0.0004). Noninferiority was also demonstrated in time to steroid dependency (d=5%, P =0.005), surgery (d=1%, P =0.0006), and transfer to alternative biological drug (d=1%, P <0.001). Subanalyses for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis separately yielded similar results. Conclusions: This study demonstrated noninferiority of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in comparison to the original in long-term management of IBD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Labrisch-Kaye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: