Mixed-methods analysis demonstrates $2.3B trade losses in cola industry, highlighting impacts on bilateral trade.
This study examines the economic ramifications of cola brand retaliation between India and the United States from 1977 to present, analyzing how beverage industry conflicts have influenced broader trade relations. Using mixed-methods research combining quantitative trade data analysis and qualitative policy assessment, this paper investigates the cascading effects of brand-specific trade disputes on bilateral economic relations. The research draws from World Trade Organization data, bilateral trade statistics, and industry reports spanning four decades. Results indicate that cola brand disputes have served as catalysts for broader protectionist measures, resulting in estimated bilateral trade losses of $2.3 billion over the study period. The analysis reveals three distinct phases of retaliation: the Coca-Cola expulsion era (1977-1993), the liberalization and re-entry period (1993-2010), and the contemporary regulatory warfare phase (2010-present). Findings suggest that brand-specific trade conflicts disproportionately impact consumer welfare and create precedents for non-tariff barriers in other sectors. The study concludes that cola brand retaliation exemplifies how symbolic trade actions can generate substantive economic consequences, recommending enhanced bilateral dialogue mechanisms and sector-specific dispute resolution frameworks to prevent future escalation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: