PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 19, 2025European Journal of Education2 citations

Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI‐Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study

View Full Paper
KJKaveh JalilzadehFÇFerdi ÇelıkVDVolkan Duran

Key Points

  • Student perspectives on teacher behaviours suggest that authentic interaction is vital for meaningful relationships.
  • A sample of 30 university students sorted 40 statements, identifying distinct factors like empathy and engagement.
  • Q methodology combined with sentiment analysis highlighted the significance of clarity and emotional support in teaching.
  • Findings suggest actionable improvements in AI-mediated education to enhance student-teacher relationships.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI‐mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q‐sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective‐Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification‐Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open‐ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over‐personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile‐aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jalilzadeh et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f43efb854d1061a58ac054https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70293
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What Matters Most? A Q‐Method Study on Chinese University Students' Perceived Teacher Support in AI‐Assisted EFL Learning2025
  2. 2Teacher Care, Clarity and Confirmation in the Age of <scp>AI</scp> : A Q Methodological Study on <scp>EFL</scp> Learners' Willingness to Communicate2026
  3. 3Examining Student Teachers’ Agency in an AI-Supported Learning Environment: Q Methodology Research2025 · 6 citations
  4. 4Examining Student Teachers’ Agency in an AI-Supported Learning Environment: Q Methodology Research2025
  5. 5A Q Methodological Study on Algorithmic Intimacy, Social Connection, Well-Being, and the Boundaries of Autonomy in University Students’ Conversational Artificial Intelligence Experiences2026