Molecular evaluation reveals high antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from dead-in-shell eggs, indicating critical health risks in poultry habitats.
Staphylococcus aureus is a significant pathogenic bacterium commonly implicated in the contamination of poultry products, including eggs. This study was designed to examine the molecular and bacteriological properties of S. aureus isolated from dead-in-shell eggs and surrounding environments (nests and hatcheries). Approximately 350 samples were aseptically collected from the internal organs of deceased embryos, egg nests, and hatcheries. S. aureus was isolated with a percentage of 49.8% of the total samples. The phenotypic evaluation of biofilm formation, revealed that 50 of tested isolates demonstrated biofilm-forming capabilities with different degrees. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays revealed widespread resistance among (50) representative isolates were tested, including (100%) resistance to erythromycin and rifampin, substantial resistance to chloramphenicol (88%), sulfonamides (76%), doxycycline (62%), and cefoxitin (50%), thereby classifying these isolates as MRSA. Analysis of multidrug resistance (MDR) indicated elevated resistance indices, with 22 isolates designated as extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and 28 as MDR. The MDR index values > 0.2. Molecular characterization using PCR confirmed the presence of the 16s rRNA gene in all examined isolates. Virulence genes eno, spa, and clfB were identified in 100%, 71.4%, and 57.1% of isolates, respectively. The antimicrobial resistance genes blaZ, mecA, and tetK were identified in 85.7%, 100%, and 100% of isolates, respectively, while vanA was present in 42.8%, and vanB was absent. The findings underscore the considerable prevalence of highly resistant biofilm producing S. aureus in poultry habitats, highlighting the Important role of S. aureus as a causative agent of dead in shell embryos and the role of hatcheries in the spreading of the infection all over the poultry production process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khafagy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: