Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies such as Stereolithography (SLA) and Digital Light Processing (DLP) are widely used in dental implantology for the fabrication of surgical guides. While both methods offer clinical viability, their comparative accuracy, efficiency, and material consumption remain subjects of debate. Objectives: To compare the dimensional accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of dental surgical guides fabricated using an SLA printer (Formlabs Form 3B) and a DLP printer (NextDent 5100) at various printing orientations. Methods: A standardized surgical guide was designed and printed on both printers across seven orientations (0–90°). Five guides per angle were fabricated per technology (n = 35 per printer), scanned, and compared with the CAD reference to evaluate dimensional accuracy. Printing time and resin consumption were recorded. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro–Wilk test and Mann–Whitney U test (α = 0.05). Results: Within the evaluated printers and resins, SLA-printed guides demonstrated slightly lower Root Mean Square (RMS) values in most regions, especially in occlusal and drill hole surfaces, while DLP guides tended to undersize Optimal accuracy was observed at 45° for SLA and 60° for DLP. Material consumption was lower for the SLA printer compared with the DLP printer, but SLA required longer printing time (90–200 min vs. 25–75 min for DLP). Conclusions: Both technologies produced clinically acceptable guides under the tested conditions. The tested SLA printer tended to offer slightly higher accuracy and material efficiency, whereas the DLP printer achieved shorter printing times, supporting its use in high-throughput workflows. Printing orientation significantly influenced accuracy and resource use.
Beyer et al. (2025) studied this question.