Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis demonstrates the x-ray flux provides a reliable mass indicator in galaxy clusters, suggesting new methods for distant samples.
We use a subsample of co-detections of the ACT and MaDCoWS cluster catalogs to verify the predicted relation between the observed X-ray flux F X in the 0.5−2 keV band and the cluster mass M 500c for halos at z > 0.6 − 0.7. We modified this relation by introducing a correction coefficient, η , which is supposed to encapsulate factors associated with a particular method of flux estimation, the sample selection function, the definition of the cluster mass. We show that the X-ray flux, being the most basic X-ray observable, serves as a convenient and low-cost mass indicator for distant galaxy clusters with photometric or even missing redshifts (by setting z = 1) as long as it is known that z ≳ 0.6 − 0.7. The correction coefficient η is ≈0.8 if M UPP 500c from the ACT-DR5 catalog are used as cluster masses, whereas η ≈ 1.1 if weak-lensing-calibrated masses M Cal 500c are used instead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyskova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: