This analysis reveals how socio-political factors hinder social change, suggesting emotional attachments influence outcomes.
Widespread poverty, government incompetence, environmental degradation, and other social problems lead to persistent socio-political discontent. While we actively express our despair through critiques and protests, our society remains fixated on a routine cycle of unproductive and ineffectual social relations and institutional frameworks. It seems that we are trapped in a perpetual loop, leaving us questioning what prevents meaningful social transformation. This paper contends that our passive engagement in our socio-political affairs and our seemingly inhibited ability for radical change is fundamentally influenced by forces and patterns entrenched in our current socio-structural arrangements, which rechannels “social libidinal impulses.” I argue that deeply embedded patterns not only mitigate our critiques and grievances but also suppress our capacity for critical awareness, thereby hindering a thoughtful social transformation. To explore these issues, I first revisit Fromm’s concept of social character, showing how socioeconomic patterns condition collective behaviors and desires. Second, I present how emotional and psychological attachments are formed within the existing socio-economic framework that sustains social conformity and limits transformative changes in our society. Finally, I propose that our aspirations for meaningful social change are anchored not only in our capacities for rational discourses but basically in our emotional and libidinal attachments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian Raymond Pacquing (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: