Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary evaluates crisis framing's urgency and specificity in urban climate research, suggesting its implications for systemic change.
This commentary reflects on the appearance of “crisis” in urban climate research. I find that it most often appears as a description of a new and singular context, as a historically specific event, and as an urgent injunction to act. I evaluate the pros and cons of such crisis framings, concluding that they tend to produce analytics oriented toward present uniqueness rather than durable patterns, on complexity rather than foundational causes, and political and policy action oriented toward speed rather than systemic change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hillary Angelo (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: