Machine learning and rule-based models improved sensitivity for surgical site infections, suggesting efficient surveillance methods.
Surgical site infections (SSIs), among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections, require surveillance, but traditional methods are labour-intensive. We developed machine learning (ML) and rule-based models for the semi-automated detection of deep and organ/space SSIs using data from a prospective cohort of 3931 surgical patients. We assessed sensitivity and workload reduction (proportion of patients not requiring manual review) at a 0.5 decision threshold, and computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The best-performing ML models (Naïve Bayes and dense neural network) achieved sensitivity up to 0.90, AUROC up to 0.968, AUPRC up to 0.248, and workload reduction over 90%. The rule-based model showed higher sensitivity (0.954) but lower AUROC, AUPRC, and workload reduction. Our findings suggest that semi-automated approaches can support efficient and accurate SSI surveillance while reducing manual workload. Further validation in other settings is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agostinho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: