This article reveals how new personal names are forming in the anthroponomical system, indicating a blend of tradition and borrowing.
This article deals with the analysis of personal names that have appeared in the Karakalpak anthroponomical system in recent times. A review of the material shows that the modern anthroponomical system is undergoing a renewal process through the introduction of new units from other languages, the use of traditional anthroponomical formants, and the integration of borrowed elements within a single anthroponym. A partial return to the historical anthroponomical system is also evident.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. Tajigalieva (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: