Review highlights how largeness shapes urban research, suggesting smaller sites may offer egalitarian validities.
Largeness, a latent quality in the spatial imaginaries of critical urban scholars, shapes what is considered valuable urban research. Notions of size are meaningful in inherited practices of delineating sites of inquiry and constructing fundamental urban hierarchies. A predominant focus on bigger cities and major theorisation has overlooked smaller sites and minor approaches in urban human geography. Smallness is explored as a disposition to examine urban places and processes free from the conflations of size and significance, and speculates three potential utilities: a critique of the primacy of largeness; egalitarian validity of urban sites; and diversification of subject and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beca Gwyddno (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: