Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study offers a new algorithm that achieves an 8 ln m approximation ratio for optimal decision tree in various applications, simplifying previous complex solutions.
Optimal decision tree () is a fundamental problem arising in applications such as active learning, entity identification, and medical diagnosis. An instance of is given by m hypotheses, out of which an unknown ``true'' hypothesis is drawn according to some probability distribution. An algorithm needs to identify the true hypothesis by making queries: each query incurs a cost and has a known response for each hypothesis. The goal is to minimize the expected query cost to identify the true hypothesis. We consider the most general setting with arbitrary costs, probabilities and responses. is NP-hard to approximate better than ln m and there are O(ln m) approximation algorithms known for it. However, these algorithms and/or their analyses are quite complex. Moreover, the leading constant factors are large. We provide a simple algorithm and analysis for , proving an approximation ratio of 8 ln m.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: