Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research presents a refined definition of atomicity and integrity for snapshots in forensic computing, suggesting improved approaches for data acquisition.
The acquisition of data from main memory or from hard disk storage is usually one of the first steps in a forensic investigation. We revisit the discussion on quality criteria for "forensically sound" acquisition of such storage and propose a new way to capture the intent to acquire an instantaneous snapshot from a single target system. The idea of our definition is to allow a certain flexibility into when individual portions of memory are acquired, but at the same time require being consistent with causality (i.e., cause/effect relations). Our concept is much stronger than the original notion of atomicity defined by Vomel and Freiling (2012) but still attainable using copy-on-write mechanisms. As a minor result, we also fix a conceptual problem within the original definition of integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ottmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: