This initiative connects post-publication peer review with European platforms, suggesting improved discourse around scientific papers.
Scientific communication does not stop at the moment of publication. Scientific discussions in the form of post-publication peer review can provide valuable insights for published articles, bring up an alternative research perspective, or even present updates for published research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2018 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: