Retrospective cohort assesses antibody persistence post anti-D immunoglobulin in RhD-negative women, suggesting late-gestation prophylaxis gaps.
To assess the serological detectability of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin at term and identify factors associated with antibody loss in RhD-negative women who received a single 300-µg dose at 28 weeks' gestation. This retrospective cohort included 915 singleton RhD-negative pregnancies delivered at Kayseri City Hospital between January 2023 and January 2025. All women had a negative antibody screen at 24 weeks, received routine antenatal Rhesus immune globulin (RhIg) at 28 ± 2 weeks, and underwent indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) testing within 72 h before delivery. Group comparisons used independent-samples t tests and χ2 tests (normality by Kolmogorov-Smirnov); p < .05 was considered significant. The mean maternal age was 28 ± 6 years and mean BMI 30.8 ± 4.4 kg m-2. Delivery occurred at 38 ± 2 weeks, 69 ± 15 days after prophylaxis. Anti-D was detectable in 286 women (33%), while 629 (67%) tested IAT-negative. IAT-positive women had received prophylaxis one week later (29 ± 2 vs 28 ± 1 weeks, p < .001) and delivered nine days sooner after injection (63 ± 16 vs 72 ± 13 days, p < .001). Maternal age, BMI, and neonatal RhD status were not associated with antibody persistence. A single 300-µg anti-D dose at 28 weeks leaves nearly two-thirds of RhD-negative women serologically undetectable for anti-D at term once the prophylaxis-to-delivery interval exceeds 10 weeks. While this suggests a potential late-gestation coverage gap, it does not directly establish the level of immunologic protection or the risk of new alloimmunization. Therefore, strategies such as a second antenatal dose at 34-36 weeks, late-pregnancy IAT-triggered boosters, or BMI-adjusted dosing should be prospectively evaluated within the framework of existing national guidelines to further minimize residual RhD alloimmunization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Genco et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: