Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares blockchain e-voting methods and highlights the importance of transparency and security.
The integrity, coupled with the transparency of electoral systems, is vital for the existence of a democratic society if that society is to function well. Often, conventional electronic voting mechanisms are criticized for their security vulnerabilities, with a lack of transparency, together with limited public trust. Blockchain technology has come about to be a possible enabler for trustless and immutable systems. However, such a standard, privacy-preserving, verifiable voting model remains elusive. This work seeks to fill this void with the use of a blockchain e-voting system that uses QR codes to validate voters, cryptographically ensures integrity with the EFFT-SWIFFT hash, and also handles ballots through smart contracts. A feature matrix together with a visual chart was used in a systematic literature review of 28 peer-reviewed papers to analyze and compare authentication methods, transparency techniques, consensus mechanisms, and scalability solutions. Though the analysis reveals that entities greatly underutilize advanced cryptographic primitives such as zero-knowledge proofs and post-quantum hashing, these primitives potentially improve privacy and also verifiability. Present in the proposed model is a multi-layered architecture. Also, the model can offer a secure as well as transparent solution for addressing these gaps. Blockchain-based e-voting can increase trust, reduce fraud, and broaden democratic participation, but it requires real-world validation through pilot projects and usability testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prabakar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: