Microbial biosynthesis produces stable cobalt oxide and copper nanoparticles, suggesting eco-friendly solutions for heavy metal waste.
Introduction: The sustainable production of monodisperse metal nanoparticles is gaining global attention due to environmental concerns associated with conventional synthesis methods. Microbial biosynthesis offers an eco-friendly alternative, particularly when using strains adapted to heavy metal-rich environments. Methods: Microbial strains were isolated from the titanium industry effluent and screened for nanoparticle synthesis using cell-free culture supernatants. Cobalt and copper salt solutions were incubated with the supernatants at room temperature, neutral pH, and static conditions. Nanoparticle formation was monitored via colour change, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and FTIR analysis. Results: Bacillus cereus and Curvularia sp. synthesized copper and cobalt oxide nanoparticles within 2 and 7 days, respectively. UV-Vis spectra showed sharp peaks at 341-342 nm, indicating a narrow size distribution. FTIR confirmed functional groups involved in nanoparticle stabilization. Over 1 gram of cobalt oxide nanoparticles was obtained from 25 mL of Curvularia culture supernatant. Discussion: Monodisperse nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using cell-free supernatants of effluent-adapted microbes without the need for heating, surfactants, or toxic reagents. The sharp UV-Vis peaks, indicative of uniform particle size, remained stable even after one week, highlighting the nanoparticles’ stability. The findings indicated stable, monodisperse nanoparticle formation, while the eco-friendly synthesis method supported scalability. Conclusion: This study has presented a novel and scalable method for cobalt oxide and copper nanoparticles synthesis using microbes from the titanium industry effluent. The method has been found to be energy-efficient, sustainable, and capable of producing monodisperse nanoparticles under ambient conditions, highlighting its potential for green nanotechnology applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: