PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 22, 2025Land2 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Spatial Development: A Study on Rural Community Development in China Based on an Actor-Social Network Integration Approach

View Full Paper
YQYi QianXLXianfeng LiLJLiu Jian

Key Points

  • Rural community development faces challenges like homogenization and low sustainability, impacting local progress.
  • Using Actor-Network Theory and Social Network Analysis, the study maps collaborative structures among community actors.
  • Qualitative findings indicate key roles for human and non-human actors in forming interest alliances for development.
  • Quantitative analysis shows a 'core-periphery' structure, highlighting the need to empower peripheral actors for better outcomes.

Abstract

Rural community development in China has made progress under the rapid implementation of the rural revitalization strategy; however, it has also revealed challenges such as an overemphasis on spatial construction, severe homogenization, and low sustainability. Existing research on rural community development lacks sufficient localized experience, and there is a limited understanding of how the development process is generated, maintained, and evolved. This study examines Xiongfan Village in Dawu County, Hubei Province, using an innovative methodological integration of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and Social Network Analysis (SNA). This mixed-methods approach qualitatively traces the formation of networks involving both human and non-human actors, while quantitatively mapping the collaborative structure among human actors. Qualitative analysis of actor networks identifies both human actors (such as government departments, enterprises, social organizations, and villagers) and non-human actors (such as natural and cultural landscapes) as key participants. Through processes like recruitment, mobilization, and dispute resolution, various actors have formed interest alliances centered around the core issue of “revitalizing and sustainably developing rural community resources.” Quantitative social network analysis reveals a “core-periphery” structure, with government departments and social organizations occupying central roles, while business institutions and community villagers are positioned at the periphery. This distribution contrasts with the overarching goal of community development, which seeks to enhance villagers′ intrinsic motivation. The study suggests that rural community development in this area can be improved by diversifying co-construction forms, restructuring core groups, and empowering peripheral actors. These measures will facilitate a shift from single-space development to enhanced community capacity-building, ultimately promoting sustainable rural development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qian et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f83319d24b29c969481aa0https://doi.org/10.3390/land14102088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper